118 cops injured, 70 protesters detained and an FIR: What Delhi police said on CJP march to Parliament on Monday

High confidence76

Delhi Police released a statement mentioning these figures and their account, accusing protesters of displaying ‘unruly, aggressive and violent behaviour’ during the protest and attacking security personnel, damaging government vehicles and public property.

First seen 5d ago · latest update 3h ago · India · politics

Indian mainstream 5
Indian independent 1
International 0
Official 0

How 6 outlets headlined it

The same event in each outlet’s own words. Differences in emphasis and language are part of the picture — we show them, you judge them.

The Wire
Owned by: Foundation for Independent Journalism (non-profit)
- “Education Rights Forum Backs CJP’s Parliament March on Monday, Seek Overhaul of the Entire System”2d ago ↗
Times of India
Owned by: Bennett Coleman & Co / The Times Group (Jain family)
- “'Carry Tiranga, no political flags': CJP releases do's & don'ts for 'Chalo Sansad' march”2d ago ↗
- “New bills, old battles, changed equations: What awaits Parliament this Monsoon Session”2d ago ↗
Deccan Herald
Owned by: The Printers (Mysore) Pvt Ltd (family-owned)
- “CJP march call: Section 163 imposed, security tightened ahead of Monsoon Session”2d ago ↗
Hindustan Times
Owned by: HT Media (Bhartia family / Birla group)
- “CJP's ‘Sansad Chalo’: What to expect on Monday as protesters set for Parliament march, police say no permission”2d ago ↗
Free Press Journal
Owned by: FPJ Publications Pvt Ltd
- “Delhi Traffic Advisory Issued Ahead Of Parliament Monsoon Session, CJP's 'Chalo Sansad' March”1d ago ↗
Mint
Owned by: HT Media (Bhartia family / Birla group)