News outlets can report courts, but cannot ‘utilise’ audio-video clips of proceedings: Supreme Court order

Partially corroborated64

This would mean that recognised news outlets cannot post raw or edited audio and video content on social media or digital platforms, ostensibly for commercial purposes

First seen 5h ago · latest update 2h ago · India · politics

Indian mainstream 2
Indian independent 0
International 0
Official 0

How 2 outlets headlined it

The same event in each outlet’s own words. Differences in emphasis and language are part of the picture — we show them, you judge them.

The Hindu
Owned by: The Hindu Group / Kasturi & Sons (family-owned)
- “News outlets can report courts, but cannot ‘utilise’ audio-video clips of proceedings: Supreme Court order”5h ago ↗
Deccan Herald
Owned by: The Printers (Mysore) Pvt Ltd (family-owned)
- “'Free to report, but...': Supreme Court says news outlets can't use audio-video clips of proceedings”2h ago ↗
- “News organisations can use audio-video clips of judicial proceedings for reporting: Supreme Court”3h ago ↗

See a mistake? Wrong summary · Wrongly grouped · Missing source · Wrong category/region · Dispute outlet rating — each opens a pre-filled report on GitHub.